North Dakota legal malpractice law
How to sue your lawyer in North Dakota.
North Dakota gives you 2 years to sue a lawyer, counted from when you are damaged and know or should know of the lawyer's possible negligence. Here is how.
In North Dakota, you have 2 years to sue a lawyer for legal malpractice, one of the shorter deadlines in the country. The clock does not start until you have actually been damaged and you know, or reasonably should know, about the injury, what caused it, and that the lawyer may have been negligent. Two years goes quickly, so do not wait for certainty.
This page covers the deadline and its exceptions, what you must prove, the criminal case question, and where to go for fee disputes, stolen funds, and grievances.
Key takeaways.
- North Dakota gives you only 2 years to sue a lawyer for malpractice, under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-18(3).
- The 2 years do not start until you have been damaged and know, or should know, of the injury, its cause, and the lawyer's possible negligence.
- The North Dakota Supreme Court has recognized the continuous representation rule, which can pause the clock while the lawyer keeps handling the matter.
- North Dakota has no statute of repose and no certificate of merit requirement for claims against lawyers.
- North Dakota lawyers must tell the court each year whether they carry malpractice insurance, and that information is public on request.
Check your North Dakota claim.
1 of 6
Six quick questions. Free, private, no obligation.
North Dakota at a glance.
Compare all states- Deadline to sue
- 2 yearsN.D. Cent. Code § 28-01-18(3)
- Clock starts
- The clock starts when you have incurred damage and know, or with reasonable diligence should know, of the injury, its cause, and the lawyer's possible negligence (Larson v. Norkot).
- Discovery rule
- Yes
- Paused while lawyer still represents you
- Yes
- Outer limit (repose)
- None
- Expert needed
- Usually needed in practice to prove the standard of care
- Certificate of merit
- Not required (the expert-opinion statute, N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46, covers only medical cases)
- Criminal defense cases
- Unsettled; we found no North Dakota decision requiring exoneration or proof of innocence
- Stolen client money
- Client Protection Fund (State Bar Association of North Dakota)
- Lawyer discipline
- Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme Court (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)
- Malpractice insurance
- Not mandatory; lawyers certify coverage status each year and the information is disclosed to the public on request (N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(j))
General rules only. Tolling, exceptions, and the facts of your case can change the deadline. Verified 2026-09-23.
How long do you have to sue a lawyer in North Dakota?
N.D.C.C. § 28-01-18(3) requires an action for the recovery of damages resulting from malpractice to be commenced within 2 years after the claim accrues. The North Dakota Supreme Court applies that period to legal malpractice; in Broten v. Carter, 2019 ND 268, the court stated that a client must commence a malpractice suit within 2 years after the claim accrued. In North Dakota, the statute of limitations for legal malpractice is 2 years from accrual.
When the claim accrues
North Dakota uses a discovery rule. In Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc. (N.D. 2001 and 2002), the Supreme Court held that the limitations period is tolled until the plaintiff knows, or with reasonable diligence should know, of the injury, its cause, and the defendant's possible negligence, and that it does not start until the client has incurred some damage. The question is whether you were told facts that would put a reasonable person on notice that a claim might exist. North Dakota's 2-year malpractice clock starts when you have been damaged and have enough facts to put a reasonable person on notice of the lawyer's possible negligence. The court added that when a client knew is ordinarily a question of fact, so summary judgment on that issue is rarely appropriate.
Continuous representation
The North Dakota Supreme Court recognized the continuous representation rule for legal malpractice in Wall v. Lewis, 393 N.W.2d 758 (N.D. 1986). The rule can pause the clock while the same lawyer keeps representing you on the matter. Do not stretch it: file as soon as you can.
No statute of repose
The 6-year outer limit in § 28-01-18(3) applies only to claims against physicians and licensed hospitals. We found no statute of repose for legal malpractice. Compare states on our deadline table.
What you have to prove in North Dakota
In Larson v. Norkot, the North Dakota Supreme Court listed four elements: the existence of an attorney-client relationship, a duty by the attorney to the client, a breach of that duty, and damages to the client proximately caused by the breach. A North Dakota legal malpractice plaintiff must prove four elements: an attorney-client relationship, a duty, a breach, and damages proximately caused by the breach. For litigation mistakes, that usually means proving the case within a case. A disappointing result, or a reasonable judgment call that did not work, is not malpractice by itself. See what is not legal malpractice and the case within a case, explained.
Experts and filing requirements
North Dakota's expert-opinion statute, N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46, applies to claims against physicians, nurses, hospitals, and similar health care providers, not lawyers, so there is no certificate of merit step in a legal malpractice case. Plan on an expert witness anyway: in most cases someone qualified has to explain the standard of care and how it was breached. See our expert witness guide.
Criminal defense malpractice in North Dakota
We did not find a North Dakota Supreme Court decision requiring a former criminal defendant to be exonerated, or to prove actual innocence, before suing defense counsel. A 2019 Houston Law Review survey reported that North Dakota's stated elements of legal malpractice do not include either requirement. That does not mean such a claim is easy: you still must prove the lawyer's error caused a worse outcome, and courts elsewhere often look hard at guilt.
North Dakota has not clearly adopted an exoneration or innocence rule for criminal malpractice, so the ordinary 2-year discovery-based deadline is the safest assumption. See criminal defense malpractice and ineffective assistance versus malpractice.
If the problem is fees or missing money
The State Bar Association of North Dakota (SBAND) offers Fee Arbitration for disputes over lawyers' fees and publishes its rules and forms on its public services page. We could not open the current rules, so confirm the details, such as whether the lawyer must participate and whether the result is binding, with SBAND before you file. See our guide to fee dispute arbitration.
If a lawyer stole your money, SBAND's Client Protection Fund exists to reimburse losses caused by the dishonest conduct of lawyers. North Dakota's Client Protection Fund covers losses from a lawyer's dishonest conduct, not negligence or ordinary fee disagreements. SBAND publishes the fund's rules and a claim form; we did not verify a per-claim cap. See our client protection fund guide.
Filing a grievance with the Disciplinary Board
The Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme Court, created in 1965, handles complaints about unethical conduct by North Dakota lawyers. You put your complaint in writing, sign and date it, and send it to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel in Bismarck with a description of the conduct, witness names, and copies of documents. You do not need a lawyer to file. The court says an investigation and decision can take several months.
After investigation, a district inquiry committee can dismiss, issue an admonition, impose consent probation, or send the matter to formal proceedings that can lead to public reprimand, suspension, or disbarment. Discipline does not compensate you. A North Dakota grievance does not pause the 2-year malpractice deadline, so file any lawsuit on its own schedule. See malpractice versus a bar complaint.
North Dakota does not require malpractice insurance, but Rule 1.15(j) of the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct requires each lawyer to certify annually whether they represent private clients, whether they are insured, and the insurer's name, and the information is disclosed to the public on request.
What to do next in North Dakota
- Mark the date you first had reason to suspect the lawyer. With only 2 years, that date matters most.
- Get your client file. See how to get your case file.
- Ask the court clerk whether the lawyer was insured. The certification is public on request, and knowing whether there is a policy helps any lawyer you consult judge whether a judgment could actually be collected.
- Match the problem to the remedy: SBAND fee arbitration for a bill you think is too high, the Client Protection Fund for money a lawyer took, the Disciplinary Board for ethics violations, and a lawsuit for losses caused by negligence. You can use more than one at the same time.
If you think your lawyer's mistake cost you, a free case review takes about two minutes and can connect you with an independent attorney in North Dakota who handles legal malpractice claims.
Common questions.
How long do I have to sue my lawyer in North Dakota?
Two years under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-18(3). The period starts when you have been damaged and know, or reasonably should know, of the injury, its cause, and the lawyer's possible negligence.
Does continuous representation extend the deadline in North Dakota?
It can. The North Dakota Supreme Court recognized the continuous representation rule for legal malpractice in Wall v. Lewis (1986). Because the base period is only 2 years, do not rely on it longer than necessary.
Do I need an expert to sue a lawyer in North Dakota?
North Dakota does not require a certificate of merit or expert affidavit for lawyer cases; that statute covers medical cases. In practice, most legal malpractice claims still need an expert to prove the standard of care.
Can I sue my criminal defense lawyer in North Dakota?
We found no North Dakota decision requiring exoneration or proof of innocence first, so the usual elements and 2-year deadline likely apply. You still must prove the lawyer's error caused a worse outcome.
Where do I file a complaint against a lawyer in North Dakota?
Send a signed, dated written complaint to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel in Bismarck, which works with the Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme Court. Discipline does not pay damages.
Can I find out if a North Dakota lawyer has malpractice insurance?
Yes. Under Rule 1.15(j), every North Dakota lawyer certifies each year whether they carry professional liability insurance, and that information is disclosed to the public on request.
Sources.
Statutes, court rules, appellate opinions, and bar publications we relied on. See our editorial standards.
- 1.N.D. Cent. Code ch. 28-01 (§§ 28-01-18, 28-01-46) (North Dakota Legislature)
- 2.Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc. (N.D. 2001) (FindLaw)
- 3.Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc., 2002 ND 58 (FindLaw)
- 4.Paschos Law, statute of limitations in legal malpractice cases (Broten v. Carter)
- 5.Wall v. Lewis, 393 N.W.2d 758 (N.D. 1986) (CourtListener)
- 6.Bench & Bar of Minnesota, continuous representation doctrine (discussing Wall v. Lewis)
- 7.Amending the Peeler Doctrine, 56 Hous. L. Rev. 927 (2019) (North Dakota criminal malpractice)
- 8.N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.15, professional liability insurance disclosure (ND Courts)
- 9.North Dakota Courts, Disciplinary Board
- 10.SBAND Public Services (Fee Arbitration), archived
- 11.SBAND Client Protection Fund, archived




